The Sexual Perversion Controversy.

The other day a friend of mine mentioned that he would be giving a presentation on “Sexual Perversion” and I thought it was an interesting and a controversial topic, to which he disagreed by saying and I quote “ To a normal mind and culture, sexual perversion is not a controversial topic…Maybe it is...to you guys living in the West"….
And that got me really thinking…..About how the lines between what we identify as good and bad behavior in different cultures have gotten blurry over the years and decades.

There is  an article on BBC Focus magazine pages 38-44 titled “Good to be Bad” by Luis Villazon. The article said that sexual perversion like Sadomachochism(Giving or receiving pleasure from acts involving infliction or reception of pain and humiliation) according to science,can strengthen relationships- I am yet to see or hear of anybody that can testify to that claim.

According to the dictionary, Sexual Perversion are conditions in which sexual excitement or orgasm is associated with acts or imagery that are considered unusual within culture. This includes, but not limited to,Paedophilia(sexual attraction to children), Transvestic fetishism(sexual interest in cross-dressing), Zoophilia(sexual attraction to animals), Necrophilia(sexual attraction to human corpse), Frotterism(sexual stimulation by rubbing against a person in public without the person’s consent).


In my opinion, Sexual perversion is a deviation from what is right in sexual behavior.
There is a scientific and political controversy regarding the continued inclusion of sex-related diagnoses  paraphilias ( experience of intend sexual arousal to atypical objects,individuals or situations) in the DSM ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders).

 Some writers have argued that as long as the “act” is not causing any harm to anyone,so it is whatever floats every individual’s boat….and I find that very disturbing.

Maryland's New Sex Ed Proposal Will Shock You…...Homo-sexuality Sex Education in Schools…..No or Yes?

Sex education is in itself a very sensitive and controversial issue.

 In my opinion the Education department should not make it mandatory as it is made in some counties in the United States.
Making it  "homosexuality-friendly" is making the issue more controversial, because as we all know, everybody all over the world, have different views regarding homosexuality, and we are all entitled to our own opinion.
I think parents are to be allowed to make the decision when it comes to what they want their children and wards to be exposed to.

"If you need proof that same-sex "marriage" is about more than "love," look no further than Montgomery County, Maryland. There, parents are dealing with the fallout of the state's redefinition of marriage with a sweeping new sex education curriculum. Moms and dads, who were already fighting an uphill battle on the content of the lessons, are now coping with the news that homosexuality will be woven throughout - shattering families' fragile hold on parents' rights.

On May 18, the Montgomery County School Board took up the issue in a debate over the district's health curriculum. Not surprisingly, there were calls for an even greater emphasis on sexual orientation, as well as introducing the topic to students earlier than ever before. In the current curriculum, kids are asked to reflect on things like "the benefits of 'coming out,'" and the harms of "homophobia... which can he shown in mild ways like laughing at a gay joke."

"Children are not born hating. They learn to hate and fear from messages they receive while growing up," read one section. One of the proposed videos even includes a positive look at transgenderism. "Your sexual orientation cannot change," the text insists.

"If you were attracted to women, and all of the sudden, you're attracted to a man, it's because you just became aware of your true orientation." If liberals get their way, the indoctrination could begin as earlier as this fall with middle schoolers. For the County, the fireworks over sex ed are nothing new. Since 2005, parents have been in a tug-of-war over the content of the lessons, even going so far as to sue the state over the suggestion that homosexuality is innate.

In the meantime, curriculum like Montgomery County's is just the tip of the iceberg for the changes same-sex "marriage" will bring to a classroom near you. Like the ripples created when a rock is dropped in a pond, the ripples created by the redefinition of marriage will reach far into society. That's important for every American to understand, but especially libertarians who have yet to recognize that their "live and let live" mentality cannot work if our goal is to preserve liberty. Make sure you know how to spot these agendas in your district.

Culled from the Christian News

Married Couples, Get In Here, Quick!

..The Sex-Starved Marriage by Michele Weiner-Davis at TEDxCU


Sex is a sensitive and recurring issue in marriage, it comes right after money, even before in some cases.
 I am no marriage counselor, but my 2-cents on this matter is: Regular and meaningful COMMUNICATION is key to a healthy relationship. Couples should be able to talk and discuss with each other about everything, particularly sex. Bedroom matters should be between just the couple and not with a third party, unless in situations where counseling is needed.


Enjoy!